{"id":1093,"date":"2007-07-01T17:30:44","date_gmt":"2007-07-01T22:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alevin.com\/?p=1093"},"modified":"2007-07-01T17:30:44","modified_gmt":"2007-07-01T22:30:44","slug":"advertising-your-way-out-of-a-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/?p=1093","title":{"rendered":"Advertising your way out of a problem"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Michael Arrington over at TechCrunch <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techcrunch.com\/2007\/07\/01\/google-faux-pas-retracted\/\">criticizes the Google blogger&#8217;s use of Sicko to pitch ads for the healthcare industry<\/a>. Why is this a bad idea?  In his post, Arrington says it&#8217;s because the topic is controversial, &#8220;Millions of Americans have a serious problem with the way health care is handled in this country, and such a polarized topic is hardly one in which a company like Google wants to take a stand. And if they did take a stand, it would be with Moore.&#8221; In a comment further down in the thread, he goes further, alleging that the move is unwise because it will &#8220;step on certain toes&#8221; in the Bay Area.  Arrington&#8217;s implication is that as a company gets bigger, its bloggers need to refrain from controversy and toe the line with respect to politically correct conventional wisdom.<br \/>\nRoss Mayfield is <a href=\"http:\/\/ross.typepad.com\/blog\/2007\/07\/advertising-is-.html\">closer on<\/a> with his critique of the blogger&#8217;s statement that Google advertising is a &#8220;democratic&#8221; way of spreading the word about the good side of your industry.  Advertising isn&#8217;t democratic, first of all because it costs money, and second because advertising messages are one way and don&#8217;t allow readers to talk back.<br \/>\nBuilding on Ross&#8217; point, what&#8217;s worst about Lauren Turner&#8217;s post &#8212; from Google&#8217;s perspective &#8212; isn&#8217;t that it expresses an opinion about a controversial topic (the health care industry really isn&#8217;t that bad), or that it overestimates the democracy of online advertising.    It&#8217;s that advertising is presented as the way out of a PR dilemma that caused at least in part by real problems.<br \/>\nThe classic lesson of contemporary PR &#8212; from the Exxon Valdez to the Tylenol poisoning to John Mackey of Whole Foods <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wholefoods.com\/blogs\/jm\/archives\/2006\/05\/\">taking on Michael Pollan&#8217;s critique of &#8220;industrial organic&#8221;<\/a> &#8212; is that when there&#8217;s bad press that has some merit, you should honestly take on the critics, and acknowledge the problems, and make changes.  You can&#8217;t just whitewash your way out of a scandal.<br \/>\nGiven the number of uninsured people in the US, the statistics about infant mortality and lifespan and healthcare cost, there&#8217;s clearly a problem. that  is not going to be fixed by pictures of smiling grandmas and cute babies.   You can agree with Michael Moore&#8217;s solution, or like his filmmaking style, or neither.  (Disclosure: I haven&#8217;t seen the movie because Moore&#8217;s style often bugs me, but I probably agree with his conclusion).  Regardless, the US healthcare system has problems and it can&#8217;t just advertise its way out.<br \/>\nAs a provider of advertising services, Google is ill-advised to market their services as a way to escape a well-deserved bad reputation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michael Arrington over at TechCrunch criticizes the Google blogger&#8217;s use of Sicko to pitch ads for the healthcare industry. Why is this a bad idea? In his post, Arrington says it&#8217;s because the topic is controversial, &#8220;Millions of Americans have a serious problem with the way health care is handled in this country, and such &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/?p=1093\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Advertising your way out of a problem&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1093","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/prDRq-hD","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1093"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1093\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}