{"id":1608,"date":"2009-07-08T11:07:05","date_gmt":"2009-07-08T19:07:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alevin.com\/?p=1608"},"modified":"2009-07-09T09:52:59","modified_gmt":"2009-07-09T17:52:59","slug":"of-course-twitter-is-conversation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/?p=1608","title":{"rendered":"Of course Twitter is conversation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of weeks ago, <a href=\"http:\/\/radar.oreilly.com\/2009\/06\/twitter-is-not-a-conversationa.html\">Mark Drapeau wrote a post<\/a> that alleged that Twitter was not a tool for conversation, but for broadcast. It&#8217;s a provocative point, and is clearly false.   Twitter isn&#8217;t a very good medium for extended conversation &#8211; but it&#8217;s obviously used for both conversation and broadcast. <\/p>\n<p>The article uses statistics about the number of posts per Twitter account to infer that most Twitter activity is publishing. This isn&#8217;t a good interpretation of the facts for a couple of reasons. The low number of posts per account is almost surely evidence of a high rate of &#8220;dabbler&#8221; use.  People sign up for Twitter, look around, and go away.  The data about number of posts per account doesn&#8217;t say anything about people who are active on Twitter but use it primarily to consume content produced by others.  There isn&#8217;t any evidence about the relative ratio of reading vs writing.  <\/p>\n<p>The second misreading relies on the Pareto principle &#8211; the highest volume of posts comes from a few people.   This is true but irrelevant.    Let&#8217;s say CNN has a service that publishes 100 updates per day on news stories.  And two people have a conversation consisting of  5 posts each.  These are two different, valid use cases.   The existence of high-volume broadcast messages doesn&#8217;t somehow negate the fact that some people are talking to each other. <\/p>\n<p>Direct evidence that that Twitter is conversation can be seen in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.danah.org\/papers\/TweetTweetRetweet.pdf\">Tweet Tweet Retweet<\/a> a research paper by  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zephoria.org\">danah boyd<\/a> and fellow researchers studying the use of Twitter. According to the paper, &#8220;36% of tweets mention a user in the form \u2018@user\u2019; 86% of tweets with @user begin with @user and are presumably a directed @reply.&#8221;   The data uses on &#8220;a random sample of 720,000 tweets captured at 5-minute intervals from the public  timeline over the period 1\/26\/09-6\/13\/09 using the Twitter API. This sample includes tweets from 437,708 unique users.&#8221;   <a href=\"http:\/\/zooie.wordpress.com\/2009\/07\/06\/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter\/\">Another study<\/a> with over 1 million tweets shows the same pattern &#8211; 39% tweets have an @user mention and 19% contain questions. (Thanks, <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/muriente\">Juan Carlos Muriente, founder of <\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>That looks like conclusive proof of the conversational use of Twitter.  This surely dovetails with my own experience.  In the last week, I&#8217;ve had conversations on distributed social networks, music, and Bay Area public transit. In these conversations I learned new information, met new people, shared ideas, and set the stage for follow-on activity.  Twitter works for conversation, and the open nature of twitter sparks conversations that might not occur otherwise. It is true that Twitter is a not a good medium for in-depth, extended conversations. Messages are restricted to 140 characters.  There isn&#8217;t visible threading (although thread info is kept in the data, allowing for threaded views such as <a href=\"http:\/\/tweetboard.com\">Tweetboard<\/a>.)  The richest conversations sparked by Twitter often take place on Friendfeed, where replies are threaded in FriendFeed.<\/p>\n<p>Twitter is good for short, fun and\/or productive conversations that bring in often-unexpected relevant people through the social network.  Deeper conversation and deeper collaboration need to segue into other modes.  The next frontier for development, being pushed in different ways Google Wave,<a href=\"http:\/\/citability.org\">Citability<\/a>, and other tools and concepts, will be means to connect shorter, real-time conversations with more in depth conversation and collaboration. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A couple of weeks ago, Mark Drapeau wrote a post that alleged that Twitter was not a tool for conversation, but for broadcast. It&#8217;s a provocative point, and is clearly false. Twitter isn&#8217;t a very good medium for extended conversation &#8211; but it&#8217;s obviously used for both conversation and broadcast. The article uses statistics about &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/?p=1608\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Of course Twitter is conversation&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-social-software"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/prDRq-pW","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1608"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1608\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1616,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1608\/revisions\/1616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alevin.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}