Networks of trust

Ross Mayfield has a good summary of a discussion about cognitive and emotional dimensions of trust.
As I said in the comments to that post, I like the notions that:
* trust is built over time
* trust is a parametric space, with different kinds of trust (personal trust that a friend will be reliable and sympathetic; professional trust that a colleague will produce quality work).
But I start getting suspicious about social science methodologies that attempt to quantify and parameterize trust. Organizations that rely heavily on this kind of analysis in Professor Stephenson’s work may have more problems than a consulting sociologist can help with.
My first market research job involved writing up the results of HR surveys in a large telecommunications company.
The results showed that employees did not trust managers and managers did not trust employees. The HR survey was repeated on an annual basis, showing that managers and employees continued to distrust each other.
This company had big problems with management and human relationships. Spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on survey research to quantify the distrust between managers and employees wasn’t the best use of money.
Pages full of survey results and armies of consultants don’t replace and can’t create honest leadership, aligned incentives, and day-to-day warmth and respect.

One thought on “Networks of trust”

  1. Hi Adina,
    (posted this comment in Ross Mayfields blog as well)
    I agree with you there. I’m not on the lookout for ‘trust metrics’ in any numbercrunching sense. But there is measurement and measurement.
    What I aim at with my contributions to this discussion is finding ways of identifieing organisational structures/habits/peculiarities that inhibit or promote trust flows between people.
    An illustration would be: what message do you send as an organisation if your service department is housed in the basement behind the boiler room? Will your people trust you to give them a adequate service level? That sort of surveys in an organisation is a different type of measurement then let’s say “there is a 84.3% trustalignment between mrs. A and mrs. B” (whatever that may mean)
    Btw, a knowledgemanager I know is now trying, as a result of this discussion, to build trustmeasurement into a survey conducted next month in his organisation. A good field test to see if our ideas yield anything useful in reality.
    See also: http://interdependent.blogspot.com/2002_11_24_interdependent_archive.html#85017921
    Kind regards,
    Ton

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *